Lap Polished Flats, Spheres and Prismatic Components – Buyers Guide Chapter 3

In this blog the measurement of optics with a Fizeau interferometer that have been lap polished is discussed.

What interferometer is needed to produce good parts? Each manufacturing process requires a specific measurand, the quantity to be measured, to provide the feedback necessary to control the process and produce good parts.  In the following posts several applications will be discussed with optional systems highlighted. 

Random, Near of Full Sized Tool Polishing

Classic Spindle Polisher/Grinder

The historic method to manufacture optics has been random polishing on a spindle polisher.  The procedure of rough forming the surface

shape, grinding to near polish and then lap polishing has been used for hundred of years.  The beauty of lap polishing is the random nature, averaging over large areas of the sphere, which self corrects, and lead to high quality surfaces.  Further the mid-spatial frequency ripples, the residual surface features remaining after the removal of 36-Zernike polynomials, tends to be suppressed due to averaging. There are limits and caveats as always, yet in general these are reasonable assumptions. Thus the measurand is simply the shape of the surface as defined by 36 Zernike polynomial coefficients. 

The Old Zygo® Mark II Optics Sufficient

Since the meaurand is simply low spatial frequency shape, in this application, a continuous zoom imaging interferometer, with the inclusion of phase measurement is sufficient. This is why the Mark II architecture as been useful for over 35 years, it was sufficient for nearly all optics produced until this century. The low spatial resolution of the imaging system (no matter the camera resolution), and inherent image distortion of the zoom lens up to ~2%, and slope induced errors have little effect on measurement uncertainty of flats and spheres when measured at a null fringe condition.

Vibration Tolerant Data Acquisition Important

More important than the optical system for this application is the data acquisition and analysis software. This starts with vibration tolerant phase data acquisition as found in modern systems to report phase data without the influence of the production environment vibration. (We plan to discuss the history and development of vibration tolerant PSI in a future blog.) Further the software must be compatible with standard industry standards including ISO and data formats (.dat formats), and be easy to use.

Upgrading an Old Interferometer Is a Good Option

To stay current and meet the the requirements of lap polished optics there are two choices: Buying new or upgrading. The first option is purchasing a newly constructed system with classic optical components that has a new data acquisition system. The second is simply upgrading a classic system to a modern data acquisition system (with vibration tolerant algorithms). The performance of each will be equivalent, with the upgrade being much less expensive.

Summary

Lap polished Flats, Spheres and Prisms in a normal production environment are sufficiently measured with a continuous zoom system, where the value choice is often a system upgrade.  

In the next post we’ll explore what is an appropriate interferometer for transmitted wavefront measurement.

Brief History of the Laser Fizeau Interferometer – Buyers Guide Chapter 2

Click here to read an detailed history

Hippolyte Fizeau, Inventory of the Fizeau Interferometer

In this blog a brief historical outline of the Fizeau interferometer is presented.

Understanding the history of the commercial laser Fizeau interferometer helps to understand the choices available in today’s market. Some systems available today are remnants of historic designs.

Circa 1850: Fizeau Interferometer Invented

  • Hippolyte Fizeau invented this interferometer configuration for an 1851 experiment that at the time supported the either-drag theory, later disproven by Michelson, leading the way to Einstein’s theory of relativity

1960’s: Lasers

  • Laser Invented paving way for the laser Fizeau, an unequal path interferometer

1970’s: The architecture is established

  • The first commercial laser Fizeau interferometer, named for George Hunter the designer

    Zygo® invents basic system architecture with sensor (mainframe) and reference (transmission sphere/flat) – the GH Interferometer in 1974.

  • Zygo® employs twin-spot alignment, with continuous zoom/rotating ground glass imaging design to accommodate low resolution (Vidicon camera) and off the shelf zoom lens (Mark II, in 1978).
  • Fringe following data acquisition introduced to replace visual fringe evaluation.
  • Bell Labs invents phase measuring interferometry on a 32X32  array data acquisition using a Vidicon camera, and PDP 8 rack mounted computer.

1980’s: Data acquisition improvements

  • Digital detectors (up to 256X256 by the late 1980’s), CCD/CID, and workstation computers introduced.
  • Carrier fringe and four camera simultaneous phase measurement invented (SPMI) for vibration insensitive data acquisition.

1990’s: Software advances

  • The First Phase Measuring Interferometer at Bell Labs

    Enhanced graphics and additional results with faster processing in lower cost personal computers, primarily driven by Wyko and followed by Zygo®

  • CCD’s with 512×512 pixels introduced – no changes to the ground glass-continuous zoom historic imaging design

2000’s: Data Acquisition and illumination Improved

  • 4D Technologies and ESDI successfully commercialize SPMI
  • Asphere interferometer introduced: Stitching (QED), Fizeau Scanning (Zygo®)
  • 1KX1K custom imaging driven by deterministic, computer controlled spot polishing
  • Push to better imaging systems in custom designs
  • Lower spatial coherence illumination (ring) introduced to improve measurement accuracy

2010’s: MegaPixels + Low Ray Trace Errors + Improved imaging

  • First newly designed interferometer optical systems that break the ground glass-continuous zoom historic design for high-resolution, low distortion imaging plus minimized ray-trace errors for improved accuracy with steeply sloped wavefronts from mild asphere optics
  • Sub-nyquist (ESDI) asphere interferometer introduced

2020 and Beyond: Light Sources and Software

Lasers have dominated since the 1960’, but their limitations are catching up with them.  Vertex back reflection fringes limit measurement accuracy, spurious fringe mask mid-spatial frequencies, and lasers are unable to measure domes, plates, prisms due to back surface reflections.

 To overcome these limitations low coherent sources have been introduced. Delay line white light sources minimize the back reflections and spurious fringe problem but are nearly impossible to align, like a standard white light source.

ÄPRE’s Spectrally Controlled Interferometry (SCI) retains the ease of use of a laser with a long coherence mode and then switches to short coherence (white light) mode at camera frame rates. SCI can also measure the cavity distance enabling the measurement of radius of curvature, without the external radius rail, at higher accuracy. SCI looks like the source of the future. 

 

Confused fringes with laser source (left), clean fringes with SCI (right)
SCI source Spectrum (left) produces Interference fringes (right)

Software

ÄPRE REVEAL software: PVr analysis

The control of the entire measurement process will become possible with every interferometer using the same measurement setup via centralized control without variation user to user. Software will guide the user as to whether a part passes or fails, and databases will track parts through manufacture and data will be reported consistently, all enabling better process control and thus improved parts. 

Summary

The Fizeau interferometer has a long history and promising future. Contact ÄPRE to discuss your interferometery needs to apply the best source + interferometer to your application.

 

 

 

 

 

In the next post we’ll explore what is an appropriate interferometer for lap polished flats, spheres and prismatic components.

Fizeau Interferometer Buyers Guide – Chapter 1

The many laser Fizeau interferometer choices make selection confusing.

You don’t want an laser Fizeau interferometer. You just want optics that meet specification, and your Fizeau interferometer helps you do just that.  Yet choosing the right interferometer can be confusing.  Just consider the choices:

Data Acquisition

  • PSI, IPMI, or Carrier Fringe, or wavelength tuning, vibration insensitive, vibration tolerant, multi-surface, scanning Fizeau, stitching…

Illumination

  • high-coherence, low-coherence or partial coherence (ring)

Wavelength

  • 633nm, 1.06um, 3.39um, 1550nm, 10.6um, 650nm, and many others.

Imaging

  • zoom, discrete, and fixed magnification, plus ground glass or coherent

Detectors

  • 256K, Mega or multi-mega pixel detectors, and then their is CCD or CMOS

System Configurations

  • Common path, off-axis, high-slope, steep surface, mid-spatial frequencies

Software Analysis

  • Zernike, slope, ISO, masking, frequency filters, box filters, and a plethora of others

Applications

  • wavefront, surface, radius of curvature, homogeneity, wedge, corner cubes and …  

The combinations are hard to keep track of let alone configure to your specific requirements and budget. So over the next few weeks we will be running a series of blogs to offer some guidance and insight regarding what is important depending on your application.

In the next post we’ll set the stage with a brief history of optical test interferometry.